by on

Preamble:

Three typical Northern European men,
more characteristic of the mesolithic era prior to the
 arrival of Arabic agriculture

In this article, I want to briefly go over what it was like to live in neolithic society in Europe and touch upon a broad range of elements from diet and married life to religion and royalty. This is only intended to be a brief primer and I will build upon the topics discussed here in later articles as I deem it necessary.

But first, what is meant by “Neolithic”? The neolithic era refers to the final stages of the stone age in Europe, between circa 7000BC and 1000BC. This is at present the furthest time period I have researched in extensive depth at may, unfortunately, be the latest time period that we can accurately reconstruct without heavy supposition.

The neolithic era was the era in which the European way of life changed forever. Rather than living a hunter gatherer lifestyle, Europeans (particularly in Southern Europe) began to mongrelise with Natufian Arabs who brought agriculture into Europe. It is important to remember that the quality of life during the neolithic era tremendously declined from that of the mesolithic, or “Middle Stone Age” which preceded it. Diet became much poorer and less varied, life expectancy likely declined with it and Europeans were much shorter in stature due to a combination of genetic factors and environmental changes. In my view, Arabic agriculture plunged Europe into a dark age from which we only recovered during the classical era, setting European society back several thousand years.

Despite the detriment of the neolithic era for Europe, I believe it is important to discuss it for several reasons. Firstly, it is the earliest we can reconstruct with reasonable accuracy at the present time and is hence a good place to start before going deeper into our true past. Secondly, it is I believe equally important to learn about where things went wrong so that we can learn not to repeat them but finally, despite their mistakes the neolithic era is still an important part of our European heritage and is in actuality much more interesting and developed than one would first assume.

Without further ado, lets begin.

The Macrotribes:

There were broadly speaking around half a dozen known language families (representing as I wish to call them, Macrotribes) in Neolithic Europe prior to the Indo European expansion from the steppes in present day Ukraine. There were likely also smaller clusters of languages especially in remote areas but these have since been lost to time unless we find new evidence of their existence.

These macrotribes were as follows:

A painting by Nicolas Poussin that to me really captures the
essence of the neolithic in Southern Europe
  • Northern Europeans (who spoke the reconstructed proto-Uralic) that ranged through Scandinavia, Western Siberia and Estonia. The main culture of these people is known as the Corded Ware culture.
  • The Iberians, who spoke dialects of the same language which belonged to the same family as Basque, the extinct Iberian language, Tartessian and also Anatolian.
  • There were the Caucasians who spoke the ancestor of modern Georgian, proto Kartvelian.
  • There were the people of modern day Germany of spoke a language of their own which heavily influenced the languages that came later. 
  • The people of modern day France, Belgium and Britain appear to have also been broadly one people, sharing a large amount of genetics, culture and possible a Celtic substrate language that influenced Proto-celtic that came later. That is a complicated issue though.
  • There were of course the Yamnaya people of Ukraine that spoke PIE; we know the most about this culture as it had taken over most of Europe by the 1st century BC. Most of the observations I will document in the following article are based on study of their culture in particular.

Life expectancy:

The life expectancy during this era is, despite various “scientific” claims, is not really known. We believe it was less than that of the modern day but this really can’t be confirmed. The main method of estimating the age of a skeleton at death is by looking at bone and enamel wear, but this is obviously not going to be accurate because one can find people who are in their 20s with worn out hip joints and people who are in there 60s with very little, so this method is frankly pseudo-scientific.

Also, looking at enamel wear is really pointless considering that diets could vary drastically between communities of people and even individuals. For example whilst the average tribe member ate mostly grains and bread, the Lord and Lady may have eaten vegetables and boiled meats.

Considering that cultures and languages could be very similar over large geographic areas, it is certain that there was trade and dialogue between neighboring tribes and probably even to a larger extent with geopolitical assemblies especially for important events like selecting a high king or uniting against a common threat.

Size of community:

An Iberian family during the neolithic era

Each tribe was essentially a large extended family of no more than several hundred individuals who mostly shared a common ancestor unless they were married into the tribe from and were from a neighboring community. The structure of the household was generally one family per household with the two parents, anywhere from 3-8 children and in some cases an older relative such as a grandparent. Older women took more menial jobs such as stirring food and also became spiritual leaders as they aged  and learnt the tales of their ancestors and the religious lore, being responsible for passing it forward. The older men would do the simple jobs in the field like minding the animals while the younger men did the labor intensive work and the children did jobs like egg collecting, finding firewood, or attending military training.

Members of the community who did not contribute and became parasitic (excluding the elderly who normally took on respected roles) were normally either exiled from the community or in extreme cases where the individual had severely damaged the community (such as damaging the community’s reputation, promoting immorality, or engaging in degeneracy) were executed. Typically, kings who became incompetent were executed in the same manner as it was impossible for a new king to be selected while the old king was still alive.

Royalty and Leadership:

On the death of the old King and Queen, a new king was selected from the best candidates in the community. As all people in the tribe were related it would not have made sense for the title to be inherited as everyone was in line! The challenges involved rhetoric, debating, riddles, physical feats, animal husbandry, and spiritual power. Once selected, the new King would then usually selected the lady he wanted to be his wife and Queen from among the unmarried women in the village as, typically, the king was a young man when chosen and had not yet married (men normally married after engaging in several military campaigns first, which could take years after their 13th birthday when they were eligible for militar
y service. The lady was normally significantly younger than the King but was no younger than 13.

Rather often, the King would select his wife from another tribe (we know this from genetic evidence) which was actually useful as it helped keep the gene pool of the tribe from stagnating and it prevented the spread of recessive disorders.

Often, the king would also have several wives. Typically this behavior would be frowned upon but in neolithic society the ratio of men to women was normally around 2:3 and hence there was a surplus of women who could not provide for themselves. The king would be expected to provide for these women himself either by marrying them or arranging a marriage with the leader of another tribe. Ergo, polygamy was acceptable under very specific circumstances.

Varg Vikernes did an excellent video on this topic:

Housing, Health and Community Maintenance:

Houses varied drastically from culture to culture, but were normally wattle and daub in the neolithic era as well as stone houses, and sometimes tent-like structures canvassed with animal skins. It would depend vastly on factors such as the availability of materials, the climate and cultural sophistication, not to mention the amount of time one had available. Below is an example of a rather luxurious wattle and daub house constructed in the Neolithic style:

Communities were normally built on a hill and/or near a water supply.

The previous habitat range of the gray wolf in red

The biggest threat to communities in the neolithic era was actually not war from what we can gather, but was actually wolf attacks. At one time, all of Europe was populated with wolves who would typically live at a distance from human encampments. However, under certain circumstances wolves would attack people. One instance would be wolves eating the livestock of a neolithic farmer and attacking a farmer who attempted to protect his flock of animals. If wolves had success in picking off livestock they would return and in greater numbers which could be threatening for the community’s livelihood. Wolves could also eat children who strayed too far from home or who were unattended. Wolves are generally too intelligent to risk attacking men directly and normally attempt to pick of the weakest prey possible.

Entertainment:

Clothing was one pleasure in a generally simple life. People owned a variety of outfits which were changed and washed regularly, normally on a weekly basis. It was typically part of a woman’s job to weave new clothing which would vary drastically in style from culture to culture but was often very well adorned. The best wives were normally selected from the women who had the best handicraft. Men and women alike wore bone and in some cases pewter jewelry including necklaces, brooches, torcs and bracelets that were sometimes inherited or collected during war as well as crafted locally.

A couple found in Brittany dated to circa 6000BC (early Neolithic)
wearing ancestral bone jewelry and shells

The day to day life was dull but there were regular religious festivals to keep people in good spirits and evenings after dark were typically free to have an evening meal, gather together to hear music, old stories and make tribute to the Gods. There would be festivals where dancing and drinking took place for the end of winter, start of summer, Easter month (no, Easter is not Christian) midsummer, end of summer, harvest (normally at Halloween) and midwinter (Christmas/shortest day of the year) just to name a few.

Hobbies including composing poetry, playing musical instruments, physical exercise and competitions, debating, listening to stories, and also even board games. Most board games were of course not built to last thousands of years but we can assume from evidence found in other areas of the world that Europe would be no exception in having board games such as Senet, Draughts, Go and Chess.

Hunting in neolithic Europe was rather rare, as agriculture had taken over making the practice rather obsolete. It was much easier to domesticate animals and slaughter them in captivity. However, competitions in hunting would often take place for the purpose of entertainment or for proving one’s worth and position in the tribe.

There is even evidence starting to emerge that ball games may have existed in the neolithic era, and sport certainly existed as a precursor to the Olympic games of classical history.

Signing off:

I hope you enjoyed this brief detour into our distant European past, and learn a lot about the lives of your ancestors. There will be more parts in this series added as time goes on and also as I myself uncover more. The most important thing to remain mindful of is that we are all continually learning and should keep this attitude towards our heritage at all times. 
The Neolithic was a tough time to be alive, certainly tougher than the present day and also certainly more difficult than the eras that came before it. To have the genes of those that survived flowing through your veins is a true honor and something to be proud of.
Heil to the blood which with every heartbeat murmurs the struggles of the distant past to this very day. Heil to our noble ancestors! Heil Europa!
Fuck industrialized agriculture! Revive the ancient forests and wilderness so we can once again live with nature! 

by on

The Wiccan: Aesir, Alcoholism, and anarchism  meet up with Vanir, vanity and a lack of virginity in this toxic mix of New Age Spiritualism and John Lennon inspired, outmoded hippie philosophy,

Many modern day “pagans” behave, quite simply, however they feel like and pretend to be spiritual. The behavior that these “pagans” engage in under the banner of our ancestors’ faith and philosophy is disgusting.

We’ve all seen them; mostly 20 somethings (and the occasional washed up 50 year old) that have given themselves cheesy fantasy names like Wolflord Flexelheim or Olgotron Moongazer, wearing a  pentacle symbol around their neck, intoxicatingly hallucinogenic clothing and usually a “Flower Power” hippy symbol of some kind. Most of them are either vegans or vegetarians too.

They are a blubbering regurgitation of the hipster culture and completely and utterly lazy to the core. They are, for the most part, morally and intellectually abject with slim to no understanding of pre Christian religion at all. Usually, the motivation of the Wiccan is to be able to feel religious with no real meaning, obligation or philosophy behind that except the desire for attention.

A typical Wiccan Untermensche

I have fortunately had little personal run in with these Wiccans, though I do know they run a social gathering once a month in a seedy bar not far from where I live. When I was initially learning about paganism, I attempted to contact this group and asked them if watching Varg Vikernes’ videos was a good foundation for learning about paganism. They did NOT respond to my message. They are not interested in what is correct, but rather what it is convenient to accept as truth, and as a result it is no surprise that the liberal movement and the Wiccan movement are closely intertwined, as opposed to the pagan and nationalist movements, which accept realities as they are and try and work with them.

The Origins of the Wicca Movement:

To provide some background, the Wiccan movement was founded circa 1954 in England as an (unsuccessful) attempt at reconstructing pagan religion. It was founded by Gerald Gardner, a self-styled scholar and freemason who claimed to have been initiated into a pagan “Coven” by a woman named “Old Dorothy”, a local Anglican lady, in the 1930s. There is no evidence whatsoever of the pagan coven Gerald Gardner claimed to have joined, and ever since Wicca has been heavily academically scrutinized, though it is unfortunately still growing. A Wiccan named Jenny Gibbons said the following:

Gerald Gardner in the 50s or 60s, the idiot behind Wicca

We Neopagans now face a crisis. As new data appeared, historians altered their theories to account for it. We have not. Therefore an enormous gap has opened between the academic and the “average” Pagan view of witchcraft. We continue to use of out-dated and poor writers, like Margaret Murray, Montague Summers, Gerald Gardner, and Jules Michelet. We avoid the somewhat dull academic texts that present solid research, preferring sensational writers who play to our emotions. For example, I have never seen a copy of Brian Levack’s The Witch Hunt in Early Modern Europe in a Pagan bookstore. Yet half the stores I visit carry Anne Llewellyn Barstow’s Witchcraze, a deeply flawed book which has been ignored or reviled by most scholarly historians.

If anyone were to criticize the philosophy of these mentally ill Wiccans, and teach them, using archaeological evidence and historical sources how our ancestors really practiced their religion, they would respond by claiming that they are simply “on a different path” and that this is no better or worse than one that a traditional pagan is on. This is an out and out lie. Claiming to be a reconstructionist movement while incorrectly reconstructing and distorting the real religion is not just as correct as diligently practicing and studying authentic paganism in line with historical sources including Snorri Sturluson’s Eddas, the Hindu Vedas and Homer’s epic poetry among many other fantastic works.

An occult ceremony within the Rosicrucian order,
one of who’s lodges Gerald Gardner attended prior to inventing Wicca.
 Rosicrucianism is a form of esoteric Christianity closely resembling
aspects of Gnosticism and contemporary satanism.

It is quite possible that Wicca was deliberately created by the free-masonic organisations to which Gardner belonged to deceive individuals and to manipulate and trivialize paganism into some kind of Harry-Potter-like school of witchcraft. It is always this strange coincidence that the people that set up these whackjob religions like Mormonism, Scientology and the Jehovah’s Witnesses are all former or current freemasons.  One of the main issues with Wicca is that it places too much of an emphasis on witchcraft when in actuality witchcraft does not play a particularly large role in real paganism. Fundamentally, the main focus of real paganism is an understanding of the forces of nature and the constituent parts of the soul, integral to the goals of self and world mastery. Wicca seems to bypass these goals entirely and focus on hedonism with “New Age” Wiccan forums full of questions such as this: “My boyfriend dumped me, are there any spells I can use to curse him?”

Now, of course I understand why pagans may take an interest in witchcraft, as it is a constituent part of the religion, but it is more of a side act which is foundationally misunderstood as something that can be continually called upon. In real paganism (not Wiccan make believe) an individual wishing to will an act into fruition ought to focus on his own Othinn, Vili and Ve (inspired knowledge, desires and power) and pay tribute to them and cultivate them rather than seek help initially. In conventional paganism, supernatural powers and metaphysical forces cannot simply be called upon to commit acts of a paranormal nature without the power and the intention of the “requester” being at their absolute maximum. Gods could not be called upon to help before an individuals own powers were absolutely spent and even then may still refuse to help. Pagan Gods, unlike the Jewish God, are not all loving or merciful to their creations and subjects. We are responsible for amending our situations as they are a result of our Othinn, Vili and Ve. Through this, we become stronger individuals or die. This is the will of the Gods and natural selection, a process that if we truly respect nature we will also respect.

This hipster idiot is not a real pagan.
 Don’t buy into the gimmick.

So, an excessive reliance on external powers (Witchcraft, Shamanism etc) is one issue with Wicca and indeed the fact that the magic is not going to do anything because “Hocus Pocus” magic isn’t a real type of magic. There are real types of magic that I will get to in another blog post. Another very significant issue with Wicca is its rejection of any absolute morality.

I will write, probably, several posts in the coming time regarding the importance for a society of having an absolute morality, but for now please put your views of whether there is or isn’t one to a side and get on the same page when it comes to the entire purpose of Paganism: Reconstructionism. The entire point of paganism is to recreate the religion and belief system practiced by our ancient ancestors. Our ancient ancestors placed certain moral values as integral to their religious structure for various reasons we will come to in other articles. They did not believe, like Wiccans do in various “Different life paths”. They did not passively allow that which they knew to be detestable to run rife without criticizing or even punishing it. It is, I believe this malleability and passivity which has allowed Wicca to grow so cancerously. Anyone from a child molester, to a homosexual, to a transvestite to a school shooter can be a Wiccan and simply be on a different “path” to another Wiccan. NO. This is degenerate and not a reconstruction of the religion our European ancestors practiced. Our ancestors would have either immolated, hung or drowned these scum and prayed to the Gods that they reincarnate more fortunately when they return (More on this in Spiritual Nationalism and the Pillage of the Mound). Paganism is not a pacifist religion, make absolutely no mistake about that.

Our ancestors didn’t like Tollund Man’s “Spiritual Path” very much. Cornelius Tacitus writes in his account Germania:

“They hang traitors and renegades in trees, cowards (yellow), combat evaders (afraid to go to war) and unnaturally immoral people they lower into filthy swamps and cover them with branches”. 

I have even read that some Wiccan groups will practice sex as a form of “Magic Ritual” and engage in public acts of indecency. This is NOT a form of paganism just in the same way that Mormonism and Islam are not forms of Christianity. Our ancestors viewed sexual behavior as a private matter between two people: a married man (biologically) and female either for the purposes of recreation or the glorification of beauty (more on the purposes and sensible types of sexual behavior in a later article, focusing on Julius Evola’s teachings). Many Wiccan groups will inappropriately view sexual abstinence as an unacceptable life choice; I suppose they have never met an Indian pagan (Hindu). All Hindus will tell you that sexual abstinence is an honorable endeavor not one to be condemned, and I would agree as long as the population of the tribe is not in a dire situation and the reasons for doing so are honorable.

Wicca: A final critique for now

The Wiccan hipster in its natural habitat: Infesting a public park
with the stench of cannabis and unwashed dreadlocks

I am definitely going to write further posts drilling into Wicca, but for now I’ll leave a third and final point to go along with the bogus witchcraft and lack of morale foundation: an emphasis on the formation of new practices. As aforementioned, an integral element of historical paganism and authentic neopagan practices is reconstructionism and the practice as according to that which came before. Of course, it is perfectly reasonable for new practices to be instituted when they fit a necessary metaphysical purpose and can help the individual to reach higher levels of Othinn, but they should be taken with extreme skepticism and with consideration oft heir necessity. Their is no such consideration taken within Wicca and Wiccans will frequently encourage each other to construct new methods of worship, new forms of witchcraft and to break the boundaries of morality in an exploration of their “spiritual path” IE take the piss and cause as much damage to themselves and everything around them as possible to learn what not to do, completely ignoring the wisdom of pagan holy texts which have been passed down to us to learn from so we don’t have to make such mistakes.

Hellenic pagans, dressing ceremonially for special occasion (ritual) only. Real pagans like this do not dress like Conan characters 365 days a year unlike Wiccans.

In many ways, its easy to see a movement like Wicca coming. In the present time and for the past few centuries at least, even millennia in some parts of Europe, pre-Christian Europeans (Vikings being the most prominent example) are portrayed as moronic drunkards, disorganized, immoral, unstructured, violent and even rapists by predominantly Jewish funded and owned television and film companies (more on that in a later article) that are all too happy to capitalize on this lie because its what the modern generation want to hear. In the next article, I will further discuss the psychology behind this and explain  why people desire validation for their immorality, and dragging their ancestors into it is a perfect way of doing so. Archaeological genetic and textual evidence is beginning to tear holes in their lies and show the true honor behind our pre Christian culture, and that our ancestors, unlike those of people in several other parts of the world (no comment on which ones) lived with integrity, respect and a sense of right and wrong. Sorry to disappoint the degenerate cowards who want to hide behind and manipulate the glory of their ancestors to justify their behavior. You, and the people that feed you lies, will not win.

Europe is awakening. We are reviving. Brexit is happening. Italy, Greece, Spain and Austria will follow soon after. The multicultural agenda is crumbling. The degenerate agenda is crumbling. No matter how many times you apply an ugly coat of paint to a beautiful car, the paint will wear away and the beautiful, gleaming surface that lies beneath will shine out the clearer.

Heil to the REAL religion of our ancestors! Long may it continue! Heil Othinn and the wisdom we possess! NEVER SURRENDER WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY YOURS!

by on

TRIGGER WARNING: This post contains triggers for fat lesbionic feminist losers who can’t get a decent husband. 

“Only Spartan women can give birth to Spartan men.”

I feel, although there is a lack of adequate role models on both sides, that females most abjectly suffer from an endless bombardment of mindless whorish prostitutes, lesbians or man-imitating blazer wearing career “women”. Choosing between these two disastrous alternatives is a false dilemma for women. I hope this blog post serves to provide some inspiration to young women and girls at a loss for an adequate sense of direction.

The reason I feel it important to mention the ultimate woman so early on in my blog, in regards to the preservation of Europe, is that having good women is the foundation upon which any future population can be built. It is the female that gives birth to the men that will change the world for the better. In European tradition also, it is generally the women who have been the keepers of traditional ways and customs, and would remember and recant to younger generations the tales, songs and incantations of old times. It is for this reason that nearly all people put to death in medieval witch trials were female.

It is only since the Christianization of Europe that the quality of European women drastically declined, and has plummeted even further as a result of secularisation. It must be said that the Christianized view of a woman’s role is approximately but not entirely correct.

Examples of European Alpha Females for the fair maidens who read the blog:

  • Boudica of the Iceni
  • Queen Gorgo of Sparta (wife of Leonidas)
  • The European Goddesses, of course!
  • Xanthippe, the wife of Socrates.
  • Gwenhywfar, wife of Arthur (Ignoring later Christian attempts to portray her as unfaithful)
  • The Amazons (a Greek tribe entirely comprised of warrior women)

Our ancestors relayed examples of archetypal women in the form of the European Goddesses. The one thing you will notice is that none of the European Goddesses are unmarried and that most have children. The Goddesses are not in of themselves absolute role models (like the relationship between Christians and Christ) but are in some ways useful resources. With that said, one must be cautious in granting too much credence to the myths in the form we have them today as it is quite possible that they have been tampered with and manipulated by Christians who wanted to discredit paganism.

Due to the compromise of Greece and Rome in the post-Homeric times (more to come in a later article), the best examples can be found in the Northern European religious tradition where stories were kept truer to their original form. Here is list of just a few female deities in the northern European tradition (Celtic, Germanic, Norse, Slavic):

History does not often record the deeds of women, for their deeds are most often the gradual, the necessary and the humble rather than the drastic and the wild, erratic throwing of the male mind. Both are necessary but one is simply more noteworthy. However, there are examples of great European women through the ages if one takes the time to look for them.

Instead of being recorded directly, the greatness of women is most strongly testified to in the quality of their men.

Sparta was undoubtedly the most superb example of European majesty that has survived into the history books complete. Although the Spartans themselves were not a literate people, we know much about them from second hand sources that teach us in depth what Sparta was like. Spartan men were renowned for being of unmatched quality, and the reason for this was attributed in small part to a combination of intense discipline and the Spartan women.

Much can be learnt about the perfect woman from the Spartans. Unlike in boy-loving and arabised Athens, in Sparta the girls were fed and educated as well as the young boys, albeit the boys was attend a military school known as the Agoge whilst girls would be raised for domestic positions. Girls also, again unlike Athens, engaged in physical exercise, particularly gymnastics and dance in order to be in good physical health for child bearing. Whilst boys and men learnt the more “brute force” skills of warfare, logic and mathematics, women were deemed (rightly so) more suited to the elegant crafts and arts such as dance, poetry, music, and WRITING.

Yes, you read that correctly feminists. Whilst amongst men the ability to write was considered a rarity, Spartan women learnt to read and write so that they could run errands and to write letters to their husbands and sons during wartime for moral encouragement.

What makes an attractive, traditional woman?


1: Not settling: Be picky about your future husband!

Do not be deterred if your traditionalist attitudes deter modern men or vice versa. This is how it is suppose to be. Focus on improving yourself first and foremost but do not expect that finding a good potential husband will be easy. You do not want to settle for a lowlife man that either expects you to cover your face with make up and “put out” for him or a man who on the other extreme is a lazy, worthless beta male who sends you out to do hard work because he can’t pay the bills.

An excerpt from Cornelius Tacitus’ Germania:

“The women live in a state of chastity well secured. If a women were to prostitute her person [IE to be promiscuous], a husband she could never find.”

2: Dress modestly: Perverts are not who you want to impress!

Dresses are the garment of choice for traditional women because they provide the greatest modesty and, it goes without saying, are the most elegant of garments for a woman. If you’re the kind of woman that walks around in skinny jeans, remember that you are essentially dressing in a manner that reveals exactly what your physique is like when you are not wearing clothes. Do not dress in a manner that will attract the wrong kind of attention. Good men will recognise that you dress well and compliment you for it. This a description of the clothing of women in Celtic Britain:

The women’s tunic was longer than the men’s; a leather or metal belt (sometimes a chain) was tied round the waist. The regional variation in fashion (as well as differences based on age and class) were more complex than the simple tunic. The boldly patterned dresses seen on vases from Sopron in Pannonia were cut like a kind of knee-length maternity dress from stiff material with bells and fringes attached. Tight-waisted skirts with bells in the shape of a crinoline are also depicted. An overdress with a V-shaped cut which was fixed at the shoulders with fibulae was found in Noricum. The chain around the waist had hooks for length adjustments, the leftover chain was hung on a chain-link in a loop. The links of this chain-belt could be round, figure-8 shaped, with cross-shaped or flat intermediate links, doubled, tripled, or more with enamel inlays (see Blood enamel). The so-called Norican-Pannonian belt of Roman times was decorated with open-worked fittings. A pouch was often hung from the belt on the right side.]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Celtic_women

On a first century AD Celtic gravestone from Wölfnitz (de), a girl is depicted in Norican clothing. It consists of a straight under-dress (Peplos) which reaches to the ankles, a baggy overdress reaching to the knees, which is fastened at the shoulders with large fi

bulae. A belt with two ribbons hanging down at the front holds the dress in place. In her right hand she holds a basket, in her left hand she holds a mirror up before her face. On her feet there are pointed shoes. Her hair is mostly straight, but coiffed at the back.

3: Learn to protect yourself and be physically fit:


It is essential that as well as men, and unlike in Christian tradition, women know how to fight and defend themselves and their family should the need arise.

Women across ancient Europe engaged in as much physical activity as men (much to the distaste of Arabized Athens and Rome, that treated their women like shit) and learnt self defence. Although it is initially a man’s job to defend his lands and family, a woman needs to know how to step when the time comes and is always prepared. Attend a self-defence class and focus on gaining strength in your arms, shoulders and back.
A note for safety though. If you are pregnant or are considering child bearing in the near future, do not do leg or stomach exercises, as having strong muscles in these areas can lead to complications during labour and more often than not results in a caesarian being necessary. Squats are the worst exercise a woman can do.
Do not be concerned about “being fat”. Women are supposed to have a larger body fat ration than men: anywhere between 18% and 32% is healthy. It is only if your body fat goes above this ratio or below that you should be concerned about your physique. Having too high a body fat ratio will lead to heart problems and a body fat that is too low will make it impossible for you to become pregnant as you will become infertile.

Boudica is probably the best known role model for pagan women taking up arms. After Boudica’s husband was killed by the Romans, she rallied the surrounding tribes in a march against the Arab Romans for blood and soil.

4: Striking the balance between respecting a man’s authority and knowing when to speak up:

Traditional women need to know when to respect a man and when to tell him to piss off. Xanthippe, the wife of Socrates, was renowned (even by Socrates) for her argumentative spirit and was known for speaking up during Socrates’ antics. 
Socrates was a notorious homosexual and paedophile (boy lover) in ancient Athens. Xanthippe would frequently have to deal with Socrates’ degenerate behaviour and once, after Socrates was sent a large and beautiful cake by the crooked politician Alcibiades, an admirer and student of his, Xanthippe destroyed the cake by treading on it.
Xanthippe was also a strict parent and devoted family woman. 

5: Be a spiritual and artistic leader:

As aforementioned, women are traditionally the keepers of old knowledge. Being creative is very womanly and a traditional woman should learn some form of art or craft. Taking up sewing is an easy and practical way of appearing more attractive to the right kind of men, as is making jewelry or writing poetry, learning a musical instrument or singing. If music is your thing, learn our old European ballads and songs and write some of your own glorifying your ancestors and the noble deeds of Europe. 

6: Loving children and family life:

Traditional women are not anti-children. It is in a woman’s nature to be maternal and to want to look after children and have some of her own if able. Do not be the kind of woman that thinks it will make her happy to put her career before family life. Real women always put family first. 
Studies have shown that women who have children are significantly happier than their childless counterparts:

https://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_parental_happiness_curve

Women who do not have any children are losers. 

Glory to Europa! Heil to the indigenous peoples of Europe! Heil to a brighter day!