by on

In order for there to be any way forward, in order for us to grow, we must know from whence and for what reasons the current predicaments of the world and more specifically those that bale Europe, emerged. The issues in question do not bear repeating and I don’t wish to patronise my readership in doing so, other than to summarise them briefly as leftism, centrism, the bourgeoisie conservativism of Jacob Rees Mogg and Nigel Farage (which ultimately only seeks to conserve and still a particular moment in time rather than to uphold any penial lperennial values), rabid consumerism, alt-rightism as characterised by Milo Jewannopolous and Jordan Peterzion, and the atheistic, Nietzschean Nazism and skinhead ideology which may be described as national socialism (often Christian nationalists) and is mostly prominently manifested in the United Kingdom by the EDL, Britain First and the National Front.
Jonathan Bowden, one of the only true intellectuals
of recent times within the British nationalist movement.
Bowden died in 2012 after a mental breakdown and resulting
cardiac arrest. 
It is important also to provide a foreword on the genesis also of Christian ethics and an absolute morality that is founded in religious scripture. In pre-Christian Europe, morals were considered separate in some ways from higher powers, and were rather reasoned to in a secular manner, usually through a utilitarian philosophy that is justified through the idea of reincarnation. Rather than a list of “thou shalt not” instructions, pagan morality was rooted in the concept of a “greater good” in which the action that would cause the most good or least harm for an individual and also for their descendants (who were seen as being one spiritual entity, only physically separated) was chosen. Ergo, pagan morality demanded a level of intellect and intuition which was done away with for the most part after Christianization, replaced with a rigid cut-and-paste set of rules. Immanuel Kant was one of the first philosophers in the pre-Christian era to add intuition to his Christian faith and to rationalise the commandments and provide them with a logical foundation.
Kant, in the way he rationalised his moral foundation, can be seen as a one of the first secularists in that he divorced his morality from his theism. However, when Christianity collapsed at the end of the 19th century, Christian morals began to be perceived as a lie along with the Old Testament teachings; this, however, was the fundamental and foundational mistake. People had not been adequately trained in rationalising their moral foundation, and when their system of morals which was built on their list of commandments was questioned, people were lost. 

“All our knowledge begins with the senses,
proceeds then to the understanding,
and ends with reason. There is nothing higher than reason.”
Immanuel Kant, 1724-1804

Liberalism in its present form originated as hedonism (along with an ill-fated attempt to formulate a form of secular morality) filled the vacuum left by the collapse of Christianity at the end of the 19th century which was inevitable, but accelerated by thinkers such as Charles Darwin. Scientific thinkers finally uncovered the lies that Middle Eastern religions were built on about the age of the Earth, evolution, creation and a worldwide flood, not to mention the linguistic evidence which demonstrated it was impossible that all languages diverged from the Tower of Babel 3000 years ago given the tremendous number of inscriptions which prove the contrary.

Liberalism, for a brief time, attempted to manifest itself alongside the guise of a secular morality as expressed by philosophers like Kant, which lasted in my view into the last 20th century (around the 1970s) before it was swiftly abandoned after the realisation of its irrationality; the mess that resulted from the collapse of secular morality and thus the final descent into nihilism (whose seed was planted by the modernist Nietzsche whom Julius Evola reviled) can be seen manifest in the Goth, emo, pseudosatanic, rave, hooligan and even skinhead subulture. The “Nazi skinhead” subculture which had its day in the 1970s and 80s, and the relics which still survive and I fear may begin to constitute a large proportion of my readers, is not inherently traditionalist, right wing or moralist at all, and only seeks (or sought) to use racial ideology as a vehicle for its own nihilism and racial violence and abuse as a narcissistic fetishism with which to glorify the self image rather than in the interest of preserving or upholding a form of perennial wisdom or the value of tradition. There may be exceptions, but I am yet to meet one. The garden variety black, white or otherwise racial supremacist is merely a narcissist.
Baron Julius Cesare Andrea Evola;
20th century traditionalist philosopher.

I will return to the concept of the “hooligan right” in a later article, as for progress to be made within nationalism the complete annihilation of this subculture is necessary. I will simply summarise the important next step in nationalist politics with the following quote by former BNP culture officer Jonathan Bowden: “Truthfully, in this age those with intellect have no courage and those with some modicum of physical courage have no intellect. If things are to alter during the next fifty years then we must re-embrace Byron’s ideal: the cultured thug.”

There was a gap of around half a century between the collapse of Christianity in its true form (if anything about Christianity can be described as true) and the legalisation of paganism in 1955; it was also several years before pagan ideology was reconstructed into a form in which it could be practiced with historical accuracy, for accurate resources to begin to be produced and for the prejudice associated with the adoption of one’s ancestral religion to have largely dissipated.

During this time, the seeds of the “Rock and Roll” movement, the suffragette movement which enslaved women in masculinity, and the advent of democracy were sown which released the floodgates to a hedonistic and narcissistic world view driven by Hebrew capitalism and opposed by an equally blind system of Marxism. which at its core is equally atheistic and hence can result in nothing more than unjustified “morality” (somewhat of an oxymoron) which can temporarily prop up a society, and will inevitably result in chaos.

There may have been an opportunity during this small dark age in order to stem the flow of nihilism and to reinstitute a pagan system of morality, which is as I have discussed rooted in utilitarianism but incorporates but is not reliant upon a sense of theism, but that opportunity was lost and is now long gone as far as any mainstream escape from the endless decadence is concerned.

Philosophers who adopted secular moralism (such as Immanuel Kant) did their best to rationalise and intellectualise morality, but failed to understand that a rationality of absolute morality needed one essential characteristic in order to function: Absolute submission. To what or to whom is a question for this individual, but this conformity either to the self, to a God or to an ideology is the only way to create a personal view of an absolute right and wrong, and for a general system of right and wrong an absolute submission from the general populace towards this ideology.

Of course, in the 21st century we are conditioned to resist the concept of submission to anything other than our desires and pleasures, and the concept of dedicating oneself solely to something higher, more detached and more divine than oneself is considered completely alien and unattractive.

Appealing to modernist, and thus hedonistic yet not purely nihilistic sensibilities, I can only do my best to motivate you the reader towards submission from the perspective of providing a materialistic or physical reward. This reward, on the face of it, can appeal to the natural human instinct for the provision of community values and thus utilitarianism that is inherent in all but the psychopathic. A system of submission to perceived divine ideals ultimately will result in a more fruitful and happy society (or societies), even if it means the sacrifice of the individual in order to achieve this, but it is important to understand that this ought not to be the highest of motivations and that a desire to fulfil one’s Dharma, higher ordained purpose within a system, and to do so consistently and unconditionally, ought to be the very highest of ideals.

“Liberalism” is the complete antithesis of the concept of Dharma, and Dharma can have no place in liberalism as a result. Whilst Dharma requires absolute submission to the self and to higher values, liberalism expects a complete separation from the self and a sense of morality. The very concept of morality in of itself is anti-liberal, and is perceived as a constraining factor prevention the degradation of the self, the self and all associated with it again being perceived as a constricting vehicle preventing true liberation. This is the idea pushed by communist nutcases like David Icke who push the idea that a sense of self is irrational and unhealthy and that until our consciousness “evaporates” we are in some manner enslaved.
Enoch Powell, conservative PM; a rare patriot.

However, this concept that to be anti-moral, and ergo against the will of the self is in some manner beneficial makes the assumption that to be held to these values is in some way painful or degenerative. I make the argument on the contrary that in actuality a separation from what we perceive as reality and from the morals which generate pleasure for ourselves and our descendants is in actuality degenerative and that a feeling of ultimate attachment, rather than a complete detachment, ought to be the divine ideal.

Whilst of course it is true that a sense of morality, of identity and of self does enslave, one has to ask the question of liberalism and anti-identitarianism: If one has to be enslaved to something either way, why not pick a kind master?

This may come across as no more than a mere ramble, but I hope it was useful for some and acted as educational material to some degree. I will be sure to expand on this topic in future. I will leave you, dear reader, with a few quotes of encouragement.

“Neither pleasure nor pain should enter as motives when one must do what must be done.” Baron Julius Cesare Andre Evola 

“Deeds will not be less valiant because they are unpraised.” John Ronald Reuel Tolkien

 “Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill

“Independence, the freedom of a self-governing nation, is in my estimation the highest political good, for which any disadvantage, if need be, and any sacrifice are a cheap price.” Enoch Powell

Until next time, Heil Europa! Heil og saell!

by on

The Wiccan: Aesir, Alcoholism, and anarchism  meet up with Vanir, vanity and a lack of virginity in this toxic mix of New Age Spiritualism and John Lennon inspired, outmoded hippie philosophy,

Many modern day “pagans” behave, quite simply, however they feel like and pretend to be spiritual. The behavior that these “pagans” engage in under the banner of our ancestors’ faith and philosophy is disgusting.

We’ve all seen them; mostly 20 somethings (and the occasional washed up 50 year old) that have given themselves cheesy fantasy names like Wolflord Flexelheim or Olgotron Moongazer, wearing a  pentacle symbol around their neck, intoxicatingly hallucinogenic clothing and usually a “Flower Power” hippy symbol of some kind. Most of them are either vegans or vegetarians too.

They are a blubbering regurgitation of the hipster culture and completely and utterly lazy to the core. They are, for the most part, morally and intellectually abject with slim to no understanding of pre Christian religion at all. Usually, the motivation of the Wiccan is to be able to feel religious with no real meaning, obligation or philosophy behind that except the desire for attention.

A typical Wiccan Untermensche

I have fortunately had little personal run in with these Wiccans, though I do know they run a social gathering once a month in a seedy bar not far from where I live. When I was initially learning about paganism, I attempted to contact this group and asked them if watching Varg Vikernes’ videos was a good foundation for learning about paganism. They did NOT respond to my message. They are not interested in what is correct, but rather what it is convenient to accept as truth, and as a result it is no surprise that the liberal movement and the Wiccan movement are closely intertwined, as opposed to the pagan and nationalist movements, which accept realities as they are and try and work with them.

The Origins of the Wicca Movement:

To provide some background, the Wiccan movement was founded circa 1954 in England as an (unsuccessful) attempt at reconstructing pagan religion. It was founded by Gerald Gardner, a self-styled scholar and freemason who claimed to have been initiated into a pagan “Coven” by a woman named “Old Dorothy”, a local Anglican lady, in the 1930s. There is no evidence whatsoever of the pagan coven Gerald Gardner claimed to have joined, and ever since Wicca has been heavily academically scrutinized, though it is unfortunately still growing. A Wiccan named Jenny Gibbons said the following:

Gerald Gardner in the 50s or 60s, the idiot behind Wicca

We Neopagans now face a crisis. As new data appeared, historians altered their theories to account for it. We have not. Therefore an enormous gap has opened between the academic and the “average” Pagan view of witchcraft. We continue to use of out-dated and poor writers, like Margaret Murray, Montague Summers, Gerald Gardner, and Jules Michelet. We avoid the somewhat dull academic texts that present solid research, preferring sensational writers who play to our emotions. For example, I have never seen a copy of Brian Levack’s The Witch Hunt in Early Modern Europe in a Pagan bookstore. Yet half the stores I visit carry Anne Llewellyn Barstow’s Witchcraze, a deeply flawed book which has been ignored or reviled by most scholarly historians.

If anyone were to criticize the philosophy of these mentally ill Wiccans, and teach them, using archaeological evidence and historical sources how our ancestors really practiced their religion, they would respond by claiming that they are simply “on a different path” and that this is no better or worse than one that a traditional pagan is on. This is an out and out lie. Claiming to be a reconstructionist movement while incorrectly reconstructing and distorting the real religion is not just as correct as diligently practicing and studying authentic paganism in line with historical sources including Snorri Sturluson’s Eddas, the Hindu Vedas and Homer’s epic poetry among many other fantastic works.

An occult ceremony within the Rosicrucian order,
one of who’s lodges Gerald Gardner attended prior to inventing Wicca.
 Rosicrucianism is a form of esoteric Christianity closely resembling
aspects of Gnosticism and contemporary satanism.

It is quite possible that Wicca was deliberately created by the free-masonic organisations to which Gardner belonged to deceive individuals and to manipulate and trivialize paganism into some kind of Harry-Potter-like school of witchcraft. It is always this strange coincidence that the people that set up these whackjob religions like Mormonism, Scientology and the Jehovah’s Witnesses are all former or current freemasons.  One of the main issues with Wicca is that it places too much of an emphasis on witchcraft when in actuality witchcraft does not play a particularly large role in real paganism. Fundamentally, the main focus of real paganism is an understanding of the forces of nature and the constituent parts of the soul, integral to the goals of self and world mastery. Wicca seems to bypass these goals entirely and focus on hedonism with “New Age” Wiccan forums full of questions such as this: “My boyfriend dumped me, are there any spells I can use to curse him?”

Now, of course I understand why pagans may take an interest in witchcraft, as it is a constituent part of the religion, but it is more of a side act which is foundationally misunderstood as something that can be continually called upon. In real paganism (not Wiccan make believe) an individual wishing to will an act into fruition ought to focus on his own Othinn, Vili and Ve (inspired knowledge, desires and power) and pay tribute to them and cultivate them rather than seek help initially. In conventional paganism, supernatural powers and metaphysical forces cannot simply be called upon to commit acts of a paranormal nature without the power and the intention of the “requester” being at their absolute maximum. Gods could not be called upon to help before an individuals own powers were absolutely spent and even then may still refuse to help. Pagan Gods, unlike the Jewish God, are not all loving or merciful to their creations and subjects. We are responsible for amending our situations as they are a result of our Othinn, Vili and Ve. Through this, we become stronger individuals or die. This is the will of the Gods and natural selection, a process that if we truly respect nature we will also respect.

This hipster idiot is not a real pagan.
 Don’t buy into the gimmick.

So, an excessive reliance on external powers (Witchcraft, Shamanism etc) is one issue with Wicca and indeed the fact that the magic is not going to do anything because “Hocus Pocus” magic isn’t a real type of magic. There are real types of magic that I will get to in another blog post. Another very significant issue with Wicca is its rejection of any absolute morality.

I will write, probably, several posts in the coming time regarding the importance for a society of having an absolute morality, but for now please put your views of whether there is or isn’t one to a side and get on the same page when it comes to the entire purpose of Paganism: Reconstructionism. The entire point of paganism is to recreate the religion and belief system practiced by our ancient ancestors. Our ancient ancestors placed certain moral values as integral to their religious structure for various reasons we will come to in other articles. They did not believe, like Wiccans do in various “Different life paths”. They did not passively allow that which they knew to be detestable to run rife without criticizing or even punishing it. It is, I believe this malleability and passivity which has allowed Wicca to grow so cancerously. Anyone from a child molester, to a homosexual, to a transvestite to a school shooter can be a Wiccan and simply be on a different “path” to another Wiccan. NO. This is degenerate and not a reconstruction of the religion our European ancestors practiced. Our ancestors would have either immolated, hung or drowned these scum and prayed to the Gods that they reincarnate more fortunately when they return (More on this in Spiritual Nationalism and the Pillage of the Mound). Paganism is not a pacifist religion, make absolutely no mistake about that.

Our ancestors didn’t like Tollund Man’s “Spiritual Path” very much. Cornelius Tacitus writes in his account Germania:

“They hang traitors and renegades in trees, cowards (yellow), combat evaders (afraid to go to war) and unnaturally immoral people they lower into filthy swamps and cover them with branches”. 

I have even read that some Wiccan groups will practice sex as a form of “Magic Ritual” and engage in public acts of indecency. This is NOT a form of paganism just in the same way that Mormonism and Islam are not forms of Christianity. Our ancestors viewed sexual behavior as a private matter between two people: a married man (biologically) and female either for the purposes of recreation or the glorification of beauty (more on the purposes and sensible types of sexual behavior in a later article, focusing on Julius Evola’s teachings). Many Wiccan groups will inappropriately view sexual abstinence as an unacceptable life choice; I suppose they have never met an Indian pagan (Hindu). All Hindus will tell you that sexual abstinence is an honorable endeavor not one to be condemned, and I would agree as long as the population of the tribe is not in a dire situation and the reasons for doing so are honorable.

Wicca: A final critique for now

The Wiccan hipster in its natural habitat: Infesting a public park
with the stench of cannabis and unwashed dreadlocks

I am definitely going to write further posts drilling into Wicca, but for now I’ll leave a third and final point to go along with the bogus witchcraft and lack of morale foundation: an emphasis on the formation of new practices. As aforementioned, an integral element of historical paganism and authentic neopagan practices is reconstructionism and the practice as according to that which came before. Of course, it is perfectly reasonable for new practices to be instituted when they fit a necessary metaphysical purpose and can help the individual to reach higher levels of Othinn, but they should be taken with extreme skepticism and with consideration oft heir necessity. Their is no such consideration taken within Wicca and Wiccans will frequently encourage each other to construct new methods of worship, new forms of witchcraft and to break the boundaries of morality in an exploration of their “spiritual path” IE take the piss and cause as much damage to themselves and everything around them as possible to learn what not to do, completely ignoring the wisdom of pagan holy texts which have been passed down to us to learn from so we don’t have to make such mistakes.

Hellenic pagans, dressing ceremonially for special occasion (ritual) only. Real pagans like this do not dress like Conan characters 365 days a year unlike Wiccans.

In many ways, its easy to see a movement like Wicca coming. In the present time and for the past few centuries at least, even millennia in some parts of Europe, pre-Christian Europeans (Vikings being the most prominent example) are portrayed as moronic drunkards, disorganized, immoral, unstructured, violent and even rapists by predominantly Jewish funded and owned television and film companies (more on that in a later article) that are all too happy to capitalize on this lie because its what the modern generation want to hear. In the next article, I will further discuss the psychology behind this and explain  why people desire validation for their immorality, and dragging their ancestors into it is a perfect way of doing so. Archaeological genetic and textual evidence is beginning to tear holes in their lies and show the true honor behind our pre Christian culture, and that our ancestors, unlike those of people in several other parts of the world (no comment on which ones) lived with integrity, respect and a sense of right and wrong. Sorry to disappoint the degenerate cowards who want to hide behind and manipulate the glory of their ancestors to justify their behavior. You, and the people that feed you lies, will not win.

Europe is awakening. We are reviving. Brexit is happening. Italy, Greece, Spain and Austria will follow soon after. The multicultural agenda is crumbling. The degenerate agenda is crumbling. No matter how many times you apply an ugly coat of paint to a beautiful car, the paint will wear away and the beautiful, gleaming surface that lies beneath will shine out the clearer.

Heil to the REAL religion of our ancestors! Long may it continue! Heil Othinn and the wisdom we possess! NEVER SURRENDER WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY YOURS!