Just a quick one for today, though I’ll hopefully have time to expand this out in future.

Though the Bible (or at least mainstream translations of it) has a load of crap in it,  this verse is a good one:

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” 

Isaiah 5:20

What I love about this quote is its relevance, even after 4000 years. It is so profound because this is happeningmore and more in this modern age; the virtue of charity, once meaning to selflessly help others and to make the world a better place has been twisted, taking advantaging of people’s good nature and has become a scam as money is sent abroad as “charity” to African royal families to buy weapons and to Israel as “charity aid” to fund their parasitic genocidal regime. The virtue of love, ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN in a lifelong commitment to each other has been perverted by Marxism and the NWO into a universalist, inclusivist expression of mere carnal aggression or “lust”, which brings me onto the subject of today’s article.

The rainbow, once a symbol of metaphysical significance, has now come to be associated with transvestite, homosexual, pedophile and miscellaneous postmodernist sexuality movements, the ultimate aim of which is to dissolve the traditional concept of the nuclear family.

The Rainbow Flag, as it is now called by its advocates, was invented by Jewish politician and homosexual Harvey Milk in the 1970s (notice a theme with these people?). From this point onward, or at least after its popularisation, it is for most of difficult to see the rainbow as meaning anything other than what they want it to be.

However, it is important that we do because the rainbow is a symbol that means something much more beneficial. It represents the unification of the chakras, the spiritual energy centres of the subtle body.

Red represents forgiveness, because everything starts with forgiveness. Red is the colour of the root chakra, the heart of Saturn which is at the base of the spine.

Yellow represents instinct or drive, channeled through the sacral chakra, which in men is the testicles and in women is the ovaries, as through this primal will one ascends to higher virtues. We are driven towards trust, instinct and even love by our hormonal inclinations, which is why it is important for those who wish to control us to cut us off spiritually at this point, perverting our hormones and sexual urges, as then we cannot ascend any further.

Orange represents gut instinct and trust, which is rooted in the solar plexus chakra, in the gut.

Green represents the virtue of love (not lust, real love) which resonates through the heart chakra, as when we love someone it causes our heart to beat more quickly as its energetic frequency increases.

Blue represents the virtue of truth, symbolised by the throat chakra because our voice is supposed to be the instrument through which we convet truth. Emphasis on supposed.

Selflessness is symbolised by the colour indigo and is associated with the Third Eye, the brain’s pineal gland.

Self sacrifice, the highest and most difficult to achieve of all virtues is represented by violet. Linked to the crown chakra above the head.

The powers at be chose symbols like the Rainbow Flag very deliberately, because they know that choosing symbols that are important to the expression of truth and confusing them is the best way to sow ignorance and inner conflict and stop us from speaking the truth, which cuts us off at the throat chakra, if we can even ascend that far.

C.D.A , author.

The English word elf stems from Saxon ælf, from Proto-Germanic althiz, and in turn from proto-Indo European albos, meaning “white”.

The latin name Albus stems from the same root word as the word elf, and also means “white”. The old name for the kingdom of Scotland, Alba, stems from this same root word as Albus and elf. In the Harry Potter novels by J.K. Rowling, the pure blooded Death Eaters, who are mockingly designed to represent indigenous Europeans, kill Albus Dumbledore, a symbol for ancient, white European wisdom, symbolising the reality of Europe’s spiritual suicide.

One of the old names of Britain, Albion, also means “white” because the people of the island of Britain looked so white compared to the Roman invaders that the face of each man and woman was like looking into the gleaming sun. The word Britain also stems from the same root word as the word “bright” or to “brighten” because of our skin colour and decoration, but that’s by the by for now.

In Indigenous European mythology, the elves are a race of pale, fair-haired beings that protect nature and work with the Gods to protect inferior spiritual beings. Elves are presented as being skilled in witchcraft, caring towards nature and pure of spirit; they are very similar (and likely historically linked) to the Jewish concept of angels which assumed the role in our mythology that the elves likely once held.

 

Elves represent the good part of each person’s spirit, the “white” part of the soul that wants to do good and strives to be close to the metaphysical wisdom symbolised by the Gods. Alfheimr, the home of the elves is said to reside far to the North.

On the opposite side are the dwarves, also referred to as Dökkálfar, “dark elves”  and Svartálfar, “black elves” represent the forces of evil which reside within nature and within each human, the “dark” aspect of the soul which wishes to pervert morality, corrupt and destroy. The English word dwarf stems from the Saxon word dwerg, from Proto-Germanic dwergaz and in turn from Proto-Indo-European dwerh, meaning “to pervert”, “to deceive” or “to torture”. The Sanskrit word dhvárati also stems from the same root as the word dwarf, and means “to hurt”.

Jewish Dwarves

 

The dwarves are portrayed in European folklore as diminutive in stature, cunning, bereft of empathy, greedy, and, if not black-skinned, they are always portrayed as darker than the other races which live above them on Yggdrasil, the tree of life which symbolises spiritual progression. They typically live a troglodytic existence and exist merely to accumulate wealth and physical treasures. In Gyalfaginning, king Gylfi described the light elves as “pleasing to look at”, whilst the dark elves or dwarves live underground, behave quite unlike light elves and are “blacker than pitch”.

Whilst the elves, or light elves as they are sometimes referred to as, practice magic that focuses on preventing tragedies and generating fortune, the dwarves are sorcerers that practice magic for their own ends, such as in the West Indian Voodoo tradition.

It is my personal supposition that, rather than suggesting that coloured people are inherently evil and white people are inherently holy, but that each race has an inherent inclination or disinclination from moral virtue, or that the outer appearance is suggestive of an inner tendency. Children, especially European children, begin their life with pale hair and occasionally even pale eyes. However, as children begin to develop, often times spiritually devolving due to exposure to the degeneracy of the modern world, their hair and eye colour changes. This is because typically each human has the genes for a number of different phenotypes but these phenotypes, such as eye colour, hair colour, personality changes are only turned on by specific stimulate. Most Europeans have genes for both light and dark hair and thus can switch between the two.

Textbook dark elf



Believe it or not, I used to have blonde hair and grey eyes. As I have learnt more about my heritage, native religion, morality and mythology, my eye colour has began to change from dark hazel back to more greenish, and on some occasions back to grey. In men, a changing of facial hair colour often appears at the time of a spiritual transformation, or an ascendance up the Tree of Life/Tree of Knowledge into the realm of the elves, Alfheimr, which is a state of being and not a physical realm, the tree of life Yggdrasil representing the Electromagnetic Spectrum.

In J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit, the greedy dwarves (in my opinion possibly representing the Jews)burrow deep into the mountains in search of gold and precious jewels, but awaken a large red dragon called Smaug, in my opinion representing the Red Dragon of St George and the British spirit.

There’s a lot to cover related to this subjects, and I intend to delve into the meanings of specific myths in later articles. This is a substantial enough introduction for now.

A review of the world literature on brain size and IQ by Rushton [Rushton, J. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: a life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction] found that African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm3. These brain size differences, containing millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of synapses, were hypothesized to underlie the race differences on IQ tests, in which Blacks average an IQ of 85, Whites 100, and East Asians 106. 

The validity of the race differences in brain size, however, continues to be disputed. In the present study, the race differences in brain size are correlated with 37 musculoskeletal variables shown in standard evolutionary textbooks to change systematically with increments in brain size. The 37 variables include cranial traits (such as jaw size and shape, tooth size and shape, muscle attachment sites, and orbital bone indentations), and postcranial traits (such as pelvic width, thighbone curvature, and knee joint surface area). 

Across the three populations, the “ecological correlations” [Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger] between brain size and the 37 morphological traits averaged a remarkable r = .94; ρ = .94. If the races did not differ in brain size, these correlations could not have been found. It must be concluded that the race differences in average brain size are securely established. As such, brain size-related variables provide the most likely biological mediators of the race differences in intelligence.


According to an article by The Daily Beast entitled “Sorry, America, You’re Wrong, the Jews Did Not Kill Jesus” the 25% of Americans who attributed the blame of Jesus’ death to Jews are slandered for possessing some form of illogical bias. The article contains the following:

In many ways it is strange that anyone continues to think this. In the wake of World War II a number of Christian leaders and organizations issued formal statements on this topic. The Second Vatican Council of the Roman Catholic Church categorically stated that the Jews as a whole could not be blamed for the death of Jesus. 

And yet, some fifty odd years later, a quarter of regular Americans still think that Jews are to blame. 

Really? Sigh.

As if the Vatican, a small group of pedophile sympathizers and active pedophiles are representative of both truth and Christianity, or even all of Catholicism. Since the Vatican have agreed that the Jews, a religous group that’s scriptures claim Mary to be “stada”, meaning a whore, and Jesus a “fool”, and that “one should not pay attention to what fools do” (Sanhedrin 67a), I suppose we should also let them off the hook for continuing to drag Jesus’ name through the mud in their scripture. Not ALL Jews are to blame for the death of Jesus, but Jews are to blame for continually condemning and insulting Jesus up until the present day, and were also responsible for encouraging, supporting and organising the death of Jesus. They are not a chosen or special people, even if they wish to consider themselves as such.  See this exhibit of anti-Christian art in Jerusalem which portrays Jesus hanging upside down on the cross with a deformed face.

In the New Testament, the Sanhedrin trial of Jesus refers to the trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin (a Jewish judicial body) following his arrest in Jerusalem and prior to his dispensation by Pontius Pilate. It is an event reported by all four canonical gospels of the New Testament.

Jesus is generally quiet, does not mount a defense, and rarely responds to the accusations, but is condemned by the Jewish authorities when he will not deny that he is the Son of God. The Jewish leaders then take Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the governor of Roman Judaea, and ask that he be tried for claiming to be the King of the Jews.

In the narrative of the canonical gospels, after the betrayal and arrest of Jesus, he is taken to the Sanhedrin. In the four canonical gospels, Jesus was tried and condemned by a majority of the Sanhedrin members. Jesus was mocked and beaten and condemned for making the claim of being the Son of God.

Luke 22:54 states that Jesus was taken to “the high priest’s house” (without naming the priest), where he was mocked and beaten that night. It is added in 22:66 that, “as soon as it was day”, the chief priests and scribes gathered together and led Jesus away into their council.

In Matthew 26:62, the lack of response from Jesus prompts the high priest to ask him: “Answerest thou nothing?” In the Gospel accounts, the men that hold Jesus at the high priest’s house mock, blindfold, insult and beat him, at times slapping him and asking him to guess who had hit him that time.

Mark 14:55–59 states that the chief priests had sought witness against Jesus to put him to death but did not find any, so they arranged false witness against him, but their witnesses did not agree together. Mark 14:61 states that the high priest then asked Jesus: “Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?” And Jesus said “I am”, at which point the high priest tore his own robe in anger and accused Jesus of blasphemy. In Matthew 26:63, the high priest asks: “tell us whether you are the Christ, the Son of God.” Jesus responds “You have said it”, prompting the High Priest to tear his own robe.

Thereafter, in Pilate’s Court, the Jewish elders ask Pontius Pilate to judge and condemn Jesus, accusing him of claiming to be the King of the Jews. Such a claim would be considered treasonous, being a direct challenge to the Roman authorities.

Hávamál or Sayings of the High One is part of the Elder Edda also known as Poetic Edda. The high one is Odin, and thus all the sayings of this Eddaic poem are attributed to the Allfather. In the original Old Norse the verses are composed in the meter called Ljóðaháttr, which in the Viking Age was associated with wisdom poetry. Practical advice and deep insights as for what it means to be human and live in this world make this little book a gem of the Norse literature. I admire it and today I would like to share with you a few of my favourite quotations from it.

A farm of your own is better, even if small. Everyone’s someone at home. Though he has two goats and a coarsely roofed house, that is better than begging (36). 

Bú er betra,
þótt lítit sé,
halr er heima hverr;
þótt tvær geitr eigi
ok taugreftan sal,
þat er þó betra en bæn.
 

Where you recognise evil, speak out against it, and give no truces to your enemies (127). 

Hvars þú böl kannt,
kveð þú þér bölvi at
ok gef-at þínum fjándum frið.
 

Thou should never sleep in the arms of a sorceress, lest she lock thy limbs (113). 

Fjölkunnigri konu
skal-at-tu í faðmi sofa,
svá at hon lyki þik liðum.
 

From his weapons on the open road, no man should step one pace away(38). 

Vápnum sínum
skal-a maðr velli á
feti ganga framar
 

Many a good girl when you know her better is fickle of heart towards men (102). 

Mörg er góð mær,
ef görva kannar,
hugbrigð við hali
 

Praise day at evening, a wife when dead, a weapon when tried, a maid when married, ice when ’tis crossed, and ale when ’tis drunk (81). 

At kveldi skal dag leyfa,
konu, er brennd er,
mæki, er reyndr er,
mey, er gefin er,
ís, er yfir kemr,
öl, er drukkit er.
 

Even three words of quarrelling you shouldn’t have with an inferior(125). 

Þrimr orðum senna
skal-at-tu þér við verra mann.
 

The foolish man thinks he will live forever if he keeps away from fighting; but old age won’t grant him a truce, even if the spears do (16). 

Ósnjallr maðr
hyggsk munu ey lifa,
ef hann við víg varask;
en elli gefr
hánum engi frið,
þótt hánum geirar gefi.
 

Cattle die, kinsmen die; the self must also die. I know one thing which never dies: the reputation of each dead man (77). 

Deyr fé,
deyja frændr,
deyr sjalfr it sama,
ek veit einn,
at aldrei deyr:
dómr um dauðan hvern.

Craniometry, the science of skulls, is a forbidden one in today’s world due mostly to its associations with dubious racial classification in the early 20th century.
Since, according to the modern worldview, we are all the same and equal, yet simultaneously brilliantly unique and special, any consideration of biological components associated with intrinsic value has largely been rejected.
At the centre of the aforementioned racial classifications of the early 20th century was the Cephalic Index, a ratio determined from the width of one’s skull, multiplied by 100 and divided by its height. The lower the value, the longer the head and the lower the Cephalic Index. A CI of lower than 75 constituted being classified as Dolichocephalic, meaning “Long-Headed”.  Between 76-81 is Mesocephalic (Medium-Headed) and above 81 is Brachyocephalic, “Wide-Headed”.

Southern Italian men
with brachycephalic skulls

People of all skull sizes are found in a lot of races across the world, and anyone with a Dolichocephalic skull was considered to have Aryan blood and be of a higher class than people with Mesocephalic and Brachyocephalic skulls. Whilst many Nordic people are Dolichocephalic, also many coloured people such as Ugandans and Berbers are also Long-Headed, as was noted in the below diagram:

Coloured people can also
be dolichocephalic

After the Second World War, most research into skull sizes was stopped and some of the records that had been made were destroyed. However, what research did suggest was a worldwide division of intelligence into theze 3 groupings, and a correlation of longer skulls to a greater IQ, regardless of race. Ergo, coloured people with longer skulls such as the Berbers have greater IQs than whites with short skulls, such as the Southern Italians. Since my father is from Malta, I have no bias in saying Southern Italians have shorter heads! On the reverse, whites with longer skulls such as the Germans (in general) score higher on IQ tests than Mediterraneans but lower than Inuits, Jews and East Asians, who generally have a very low CI.

Here are my own personal measurements:

Skull Width: 13.25cm
Skull Depth: 17cm 
Cephalic Index: 77.9
Skull Type: Mesocephalic (Medium-Headed)

Skull depth should be measured from between 
the  eyebrows to the most prominent point
 at the back of the head, whilst skull width should 
be measured  from the point above 
the cheekbones near the ears