THE ‘GAY’ TAKEOVER:
The Alt-Right is far from being a single entity. The term is used by or applied to a wide sweep of political views, ranging from libertarians and Zionists through Trump supporters, America Firsters and white separatists, and then on to white supremacists and the outright Nazis who popularised the AltRight’s distinctive Pepe the Frog meme.
As Milo Yiannopoulos and fellow Breitbart writer Allum Bokhari wrote in their essay, An Establishment Conservative’s Guide to the Alt-Right: “There are a myriad of agreements between its supporters over what they should build, but virtual unity over what they should destroy.”
The left and the mainstream liberal media like – often for dishonest propaganda purposes, sometimes out of sheer ignorance – to present them all as essentially the same. In terms of the actual views and aims of all those on the Alt-Right spectrum, that simply is not true. But the hugely disparate factions of the Alt-Right do indeed tend to share one more factor above their common detestation for leftists and hostility to Islamism: Their enthusiasm for, or tolerance of, homosexualism.
I use the term ‘homosexualism’ as opposed to ‘homosexuality’ quite deliberately. Because the Alt Right’s tolerance goes far beyond not having ‘antigay’ witch-hunts, beyond the old “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” position, whereby the fact that an individual could be a homosexual is regarded as a non-issue in return for their not publicly flaunting the fact. ‘Homosexualism’, by contrast, involves making an issue of it, turning it from a shameful vice into a loudly proclaimed modern ‘virtue’. To put it bluntly, waving it in our faces.
Ideologically and politically, the different strands of the ‘Alt-Right’ are so disparate that it is almost absurd to try to pin a common label on them. As this study shows, the only thing many of them really have in common is the position of many of their leading lights on same-sex relationships – apart from their opposition to Islam, which seems in many cases to be a reaction to Islam’s hostility to homosexuality.
|What sort of ‘Catholic’ praises, as Milo has, sick ‘queer street theatre’
groups such as the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, seen here in one of
their blasphemous and Satanic mockeries of Christian European identity?
Let us start with perhaps the internationally best known ‘member’ of the Alt-Right, the British-born provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos, who ‘married’ his Afro-American boyfriend in September 2017.
Milo is an upper-class, self-proclaimed Catholic of Greek, Irish and Jewish heritage . Intelligent, articulate and clearly possessing considerable personal courage, this self-confessed homosexual has in the past even said that gays should “get back in the closet”. More recently, however, he has become more and more outrageous and has become a figurehead for the ‘gay Alt-Right’.
Milo’s outspoken criticism of Islam and of its thuggish far-left apologists made him something of a cult figure among ‘right-wing’ students in Britain and the USA. He also became the Tech editor of the hugely influential right-wing news portal, Breitbart.
One episode of The Milo Yiannopoulos Show in particular gave a valuable insight into the process at work in turning gay intellectuals to the ‘right’. Immediately after the Islamist massacre at the homosexual nightclub in Orlando, Yiannopoulos sat down to talk with fellow homosexual British writer, journalist, and neocon think-tank spokesman Douglas Murray. 
“I wanted to get you on the show this because I’m sat here in a hotel room… sitting here in Orlando, in Florida, where a Muslim gunman has just executed 50 homosexuals in a nightclub, and injured another 50,” said Yiannopoulos after welcoming Murray to the show.
“Barack Obama took to the air immediately afterwards and spoke more about gun control than he did about radical Islam, which is to say he didn’t mention radical Islam at all,” he continued. “Why is it we’re hearing so little from the mainstream liberal media about the real reasons for these sorts of crimes. Why do they keep making excuses?”
Yiannopoulos and Murray also discussed “how the left is betraying homosexuals.”
Even while working for the supposedly conservative Breitbart, however, Milo went out of his way to shock and provoke, and arguably to subvert the traditional right-wing by mocking the church to which he claimed to belong, approving of immigration (as long as it involved non-Muslims) and blatantly flaunting his homosexuality.
Despite this ‘right-liberal’ position, leftist liberals were outraged when Milo announced that he had signed a book deal with, and was to receive a $250,000 advance for, his autobiography – Dangerous – courtesy of publishers Simon & Schuster.
Then, however, he made a provocation too far during an internet livestream and circulated in an edited video on Twitter.
Leftists with a long history of wanting to lower the age of consent rather hypocritically, but wholly accurately, complained that Milo was endorsing sex between “younger boys” and older men’.
In the clip, Yiannopoulos said the age of consent was “not this black and white thing” and that relationships “between younger boys and older men … can be hugely positive experiences”.
The American Conservative Union rescinded a high-profile invitation to Yiannopoulos to speak at its annual CPac conference over this “offensive video … condoning paedophilia”. Matt Schlapp, the ACU chairman, said Yiannopoulos’ response was “insufficient” and urged him to “immediately further address these disturbing comments”.
Simon & Schuster promptly cancelled the publication contract, while his fellow Breitbart employees threatened to quit if he is not fired, leading to his resignation from the post, while claiming lamely that his comments had been “taken out of context”.
Let us be blunt though, for this brings us to the very crux of the matter: Homosexuality is not a ‘victimless crime’. There is a close and scientifically proven link between homosexuality and pederasty. The truth is remarkably similar to the CounterJihad’s dictum that “Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims” because, while not all homosexuals are pederasts, most pederasts are homosexual.
This document is not the place for a lengthy explanation of this fact, but among the studies supporting this assertion, homosexual Alfred Kinsey, the preeminent sexual researcher in the history of sexual research, found in 1948 that 37 percent of all male homosexuals admitted to having sex with children under 17 years old.
More recently a study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior (2000) found that “The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer men. In contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles.” 
The entire Counter-Jihad movement repeatedly criticises Islam as paedophilic for its support for marriage between adult men and pubescent girls, and for the widespread silence of Muslims on the scandal of grooming gangs targeting young girls for sex.
This criticism is of course absolutely correct and justified. But it is also deeply hypocritical if those making it refuse in turn to criticize homosexuals for their involvement in or silence over the targeting of pubescent boys.
Muslim groomers want your daughters; homosexual chickenhawks want your sons. How is one less evil or less dangerous to the future demography of the West? And the homosexualists and the liberals are forcing pro-gay and ‘gender’ indoctrination programmes in virtually every junior school in the West to help them get them.
I challenge the Alt-Right to condemn both these evils with the same vigour.